Discounting is a constant balancing act. Each markdown can attract more customers and boost sales volume, but also chips away at your contribution margin.
By its very nature, discounting reduces the sales price per unit, but should improve your marketing efficiency (MER) by converting more customers than you would've without the offer.
You charge less, but you spend less on ads per sale. How this trade-off materialises is hugely important.
To assess how discounting can shift your contribution margin, let's first establish a baseline scenario without a discount. For argument's sake, we'll assume your performance marketing budget is fixed at $150,000.
At a selling price of $100, the contribution margin, after taking all variable costs into account, is $37 per unit. It costs $30 in ad spend to sell each unit, so with a budget of $150,000, you should sell 5,000 units and generate an overall contribution margin of $185,000 for the business.
Now let's introduce a scenario where you discount your product by 20% in a bid to sell a higher volume of products:
At a discount of 20%, the net income is reduced by $20. But further down the profit and loss (P&L) statement, paid ads become more efficient with a discount in place, now costing $6 less per unit.
In this instance, the improved marketing efficiency hasn't fully counteracted the reduction in selling price, so overall contribution margin reduces by $14.
With the same ad budget of $150,000, you sell more units as expected: an additional 1,250. But the total contribution margin earned has fallen to $143,750.
So it's settled, right? Ditch the discount? Well, not so fast. You need to go one step further and consider the lifetime value of new customers you've just acquired.